There are two ways of adding packages, either using the
add command or the
dev command. The most frequently used is
add and its usage is described first.
In the Pkg REPL, packages can be added with the
add command followed by the name of the package, for example:
(v1.0) pkg> add Example Cloning default registries into /Users/kristoffer/.julia/registries Cloning registry General from "https://github.com/JuliaRegistries/General.git" Updating registry at `~/.julia/registries/General` Updating git-repo `https://github.com/JuliaRegistries/General.git` Resolving package versions... Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.0/Project.toml` [7876af07] + Example v0.5.1 Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.0/Manifest.toml` [7876af07] + Example v0.5.1 [8dfed614] + Test
Here we added the package Example to the current project. In this example, we are using a fresh Julia installation, and this is our first time adding a package using Pkg. By default, Pkg clones Julia's General registry, and uses this registry to look up packages requested for inclusion in the current environment. The status update shows a short form of the package UUID to the left, then the package name, and the version. Since standard libraries (e.g.
Test) are shipped with Julia, they do not have a version. The project status contains the packages you have added yourself, in this case,
(v1.0) pkg> st Status `Project.toml` [7876af07] Example v0.5.1
The manifest status shows all the packages in the environment, including recursive dependencies:
(v1.0) pkg> st --manifest Status `Manifest.toml` [7876af07] Example v0.5.1 [8dfed614] Test
It is possible to add multiple packages in one command as
pkg> add A B C.
After a package is added to the project, it can be loaded in Julia:
julia> using Example julia> Example.hello("User") "Hello, User"
A specific version can be installed by appending a version after a
@ symbol, e.g.
@v0.4, to the package name:
(v1.0) pkg> add Example@0.4 Resolving package versions... Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.0/Project.toml` [7876af07] + Example v0.4.1 Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.0/Manifest.toml` [7876af07] + Example v0.4.1
If a branch (or a certain commit) of
Example has a hotfix that is not yet included in a registered version, we can explicitly track that branch (or commit) by appending
#commitSHA1) to the package name:
(v1.0) pkg> add Example#master Updating git-repo `https://github.com/JuliaLang/Example.jl.git` Resolving package versions... Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.0/Project.toml` [7876af07] ~ Example v0.5.1 ⇒ v0.5.1+ #master (https://github.com/JuliaLang/Example.jl.git) Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.0/Manifest.toml` [7876af07] ~ Example v0.5.1 ⇒ v0.5.1+ #master (https://github.com/JuliaLang/Example.jl.git)
The status output now shows that we are tracking the
master branch of
Example. When updating packages, we will pull updates from that branch.
To go back to tracking the registry version of
Example, the command
free is used:
(v1.0) pkg> free Example Resolving package versions... Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.0/Project.toml` [7876af07] ~ Example v0.5.1+ #master (https://github.com/JuliaLang/Example.jl.git) ⇒ v0.5.1 Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.0/Manifest.toml` [7876af07] ~ Example v0.5.1+ #master )https://github.com/JuliaLang/Example.jl.git) ⇒ v0.5.1
If a package is not in a registry, it can be added by specifying a URL to the repository:
(v1.0) pkg> add https://github.com/fredrikekre/ImportMacros.jl Updating git-repo `https://github.com/fredrikekre/ImportMacros.jl` Resolving package versions... Downloaded MacroTools ─ v0.4.1 Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.0/Project.toml` [e6797606] + ImportMacros v0.0.0 # (https://github.com/fredrikekre/ImportMacros.jl) Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.0/Manifest.toml` [e6797606] + ImportMacros v0.0.0 # (https://github.com/fredrikekre/ImportMacros.jl) [1914dd2f] + MacroTools v0.4.1
The dependencies of the unregistered package (here
MacroTools) got installed. For unregistered packages we could have given a branch name (or commit SHA1) to track using
#, just like for registered packages.
If you want to add a package using the SSH-based
git protocol, you have to use quotes because the URL contains a
@. For example,
(v1.0) pkg> add "email@example.com:fredrikekre/ImportMacros.jl.git" Cloning git-repo `firstname.lastname@example.org:fredrikekre/ImportMacros.jl.git` Updating git-repo `email@example.com:fredrikekre/ImportMacros.jl.git` Updating registry at `~/.julia/registries/General` Resolving package versions... Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1/Project.toml` [92a963f6] + ImportMacros v1.0.0 `firstname.lastname@example.org:fredrikekre/ImportMacros.jl.git#master` Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1/Manifest.toml` [92a963f6] + ImportMacros v1.0.0 `email@example.com:fredrikekre/ImportMacros.jl.git#master`
Instead of giving a URL of a git repo to
add we could instead have given a local path to a git repo. This works similar to adding a URL. The local repository will be tracked (at some branch) and updates from that local repo are pulled when packages are updated. Note tracking a package through
add is distinct from
develop: changes to files in the local package repository will not immediately be reflected when loading that package. The changes would have to be committed and the packages updated in order to pull in the changes.
In addition, it is possible to add packages relatively to the
Manifest.toml file, see Developing packages for an example.
By only using
add your Manifest will always have a "reproducible state", in other words, as long as the repositories and registries used are still accessible it is possible to retrieve the exact state of all the dependencies in the project. This has the advantage that you can send your project (
Manifest.toml) to someone else and they can "instantiate" that project in the same state as you had it locally. However, when you are developing a package, it is more convenient to load packages at their current state at some path. For this reason, the
dev command exists.
Let's try to
dev a registered package:
(v1.0) pkg> dev Example Updating git-repo `https://github.com/JuliaLang/Example.jl.git` Resolving package versions... Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.0/Project.toml` [7876af07] + Example v0.5.1+ [`~/.julia/dev/Example`] Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.0/Manifest.toml` [7876af07] + Example v0.5.1+ [`~/.julia/dev/Example`]
dev command fetches a full clone of the package to
~/.julia/dev/ (the path can be changed by setting the environment variable
JULIA_PKG_DEVDIR, the default being
joinpath(DEPOT_PATH,"dev")). When importing
Example julia will now import it from
~/.julia/dev/Example and whatever local changes have been made to the files in that path are consequently reflected in the code loaded. When we used
add we said that we tracked the package repository, we here say that we track the path itself. Note the package manager will never touch any of the files at a tracked path. It is therefore up to you to pull updates, change branches etc. If we try to
dev a package at some branch that already exists at
~/.julia/dev/ the package manager we will simply use the existing path. For example:
(v1.0) pkg> dev Example Updating git-repo `https://github.com/JuliaLang/Example.jl.git` [ Info: Path `/Users/kristoffer/.julia/dev/Example` exists and looks like the correct package, using existing path instead of cloning
Note the info message saying that it is using the existing path. When tracking a path, the package manager will never modify the files at that path.
dev is used on a local path, that path to that package is recorded and used when loading that package. The path will be recorded relative to the project file, unless it is given as an absolute path.
To stop tracking a path and use the registered version again, use
(v1.0) pkg> free Example Resolving package versions... Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.0/Project.toml` [7876af07] ↓ Example v0.5.1+ [`~/.julia/dev/Example`] ⇒ v0.5.1 Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.0/Manifest.toml` [7876af07] ↓ Example v0.5.1+ [`~/.julia/dev/Example`] ⇒ v0.5.1
It should be pointed out that by using
dev your project is now inherently stateful. Its state depends on the current content of the files at the path and the manifest cannot be "instantiated" by someone else without knowing the exact content of all the packages that are tracking a path.
Note that if you add a dependency to a package that tracks a local path, the Manifest (which contains the whole dependency graph) will become out of sync with the actual dependency graph. This means that the package will not be able to load that dependency since it is not recorded in the Manifest. To synchronize the Manifest, use the REPL command
In addition to absolute paths,
dev can accept relative paths to packages. In this case, the relative path from the active project to the package is stored. This approach is useful when the relative location of tracked dependencies is more important than their absolute location. For example, the tracked dependencies can be stored inside of the active project directory. The whole directory can be moved and
Pkg will still be able to find the dependencies because their path relative to the active project is preserved even though their absolute path has changed.
Packages can be removed from the current project by using
pkg> rm Package. This will only remove packages that exist in the project; to remove a package that only exists as a dependency use
pkg> rm --manifest DepPackage. Note that this will remove all packages that depend on
When new versions of packages that the project is using are released, it is a good idea to update. Simply calling
up will try to update all the dependencies of the project to the latest compatible version. Sometimes this is not what you want. You can specify a subset of the dependencies to upgrade by giving them as arguments to
(v1.0) pkg> up Example
Example has a dependency which is also a dependency for another explicitly added package, that dependency will not be updated. If you only want to update the minor version of packages, to reduce the risk that your project breaks, you can give the
--minor flag, e.g:
(v1.0) pkg> up --minor Example
Packages that track a local repository are not updated when a minor upgrade is done. Packages that track a path are never touched by the package manager.
A pinned package will never be updated. A package can be pinned using
pin, for example:
(v1.0) pkg> pin Example Resolving package versions... Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.0/Project.toml` [7876af07] ~ Example v0.5.1 ⇒ v0.5.1 ⚲ Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.0/Manifest.toml` [7876af07] ~ Example v0.5.1 ⇒ v0.5.1 ⚲
Note the pin symbol
⚲ showing that the package is pinned. Removing the pin is done using
(v1.0) pkg> free Example Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.0/Project.toml` [7876af07] ~ Example v0.5.1 ⚲ ⇒ v0.5.1 Updating `~/.julia/environments/v1.0/Manifest.toml` [7876af07] ~ Example v0.5.1 ⚲ ⇒ v0.5.1
The tests for a package can be run using
(v1.0) pkg> test Example Testing Example Testing Example tests passed
The build step of a package is automatically run when a package is first installed. The output of the build process is directed to a file. To explicitly run the build step for a package, the
build command is used:
(v1.0) pkg> build MbedTLS Building MbedTLS → `~/.julia/packages/MbedTLS/h1Vu/deps/build.log` julia> print(read("~/.julia/packages/MbedTLS/h1Vu/deps/build.log", String)) ┌ Warning: `wait(t::Task)` is deprecated, use `fetch(t)` instead. │ caller = macro expansion at OutputCollector.jl:63 [inlined] └ @ Core OutputCollector.jl:63 ... [ Info: using prebuilt binaries
An environment consists of a set of mutually-compatible packages. Sometimes, you can find yourself in a situation in which two packages you'd like to use simultaneously have incompatible requirements. In such cases you'll get an "Unsatisfiable requirements" error:
pkg> add A Unsatisfiable requirements detected for package D [756980fe]: D [756980fe] log: ├─possible versions are: 0.1.0-0.2.1 or uninstalled ├─restricted by compatibility requirements with B [f4259836] to versions: 0.1.0 │ └─B [f4259836] log: │ ├─possible versions are: 1.0.0 or uninstalled │ └─restricted to versions * by an explicit requirement, leaving only versions 1.0.0 └─restricted by compatibility requirements with C [c99a7cb2] to versions: 0.2.0 — no versions left └─C [c99a7cb2] log: ├─possible versions are: 0.1.0-0.2.0 or uninstalled └─restricted by compatibility requirements with A [29c70717] to versions: 0.2.0 └─A [29c70717] log: ├─possible versions are: 1.0.0 or uninstalled └─restricted to versions * by an explicit requirement, leaving only versions 1.0.0
This message means that a package named
D has a version conflict. Even if you have never
D directly, this kind of error can arise if
D is required by other packages that you are trying to use.
The error message has a lot of crucial information. It may be easiest to interpret piecewise:
Unsatisfiable requirements detected for package D [756980fe]: D [756980fe] log: ├─possible versions are: [0.1.0, 0.2.0-0.2.1] or uninstalled
D has three released versions,
v0.2.1. You also have the option of not having it installed at all. Each of these options might have different implications for the set of other packages that can be installed.
Crucially, notice the stroke characters (vertical and horizontal lines) and their indentation. Together, these connect messages to specific packages. For instance the right stroke of
├─ indicates that the message to its right (
possible versions...) is connected to the package pointed to by its vertical stroke (
D). This same principle applies to the next line:
├─restricted by compatibility requirements with B [f4259836] to versions: 0.1.0
The vertical stroke here is also aligned under
D, and thus this message is in reference to
D. Specifically, there's some other package
B that depends on version
D. Notice that this is not the newest version of
Next comes some information about
│ └─B [f4259836] log: │ ├─possible versions are: 1.0.0 or uninstalled │ └─restricted to versions * by an explicit requirement, leaving only versions 1.0.0
The two lines below the first have a vertical stroke that aligns with
B, and thus they provide information about
B. They tell you that
B has just one release,
v1.0.0. You've not specified a particular version of
restricted to versions * means that any version will do), but the
explicit requirement means that you've asked for
B to be part of your environment, for example by
pkg> add B. You might have asked for
B previously, and the requirement is still active.
The conflict becomes clear with the line
└─restricted by compatibility requirements with C [c99a7cb2] to versions: 0.2.0 — no versions left
Here again the vertical stroke aligns with
D: this means that
D is also required by another package,
D, and this conflicts with
B's need for
D. This explains the conflict.
But wait, you might ask, what is
C and why do I need it at all? The next few lines introduce the problem:
└─C [c99a7cb2] log: ├─possible versions are: [0.1.0-0.1.1, 0.2.0] or uninstalled └─restricted by compatibility requirements with A [29c70717] to versions: 0.2.0
These provide more information about
C, revealing that it has 3 released versions:
C is required by another package
A's requirements are such that we need
A's origin is revealed on the next lines:
└─A [29c70717] log: ├─possible versions are: 1.0.0 or uninstalled └─restricted to versions * by an explicit requirement, leaving only versions 1.0.0
So we can see that
explicitly required, and in this case it's because we were trying to
add it to our environment.
In summary, we explicitly asked to use
B, but this gave a conflict for
D. The reason was that
C require conflicting versions of
D. Even though
C isn't something we asked for explicitly, it was needed by
To fix such errors, you have a number of options:
- try updating your packages. It's possible the developers of these packages have recently released new versions that are mutually compatible.
- remove either
Bfrom your environment. Perhaps
Bis left over from something you were previously working on, and you don't need it anymore. If you don't need
Bat the same time, this is the easiest way to fix the problem.
- try reporting your conflict. In this case, we were able to deduce that
Brequires an outdated version of
D. You could thus report an issue in the development repository of
B.jlasking for an updated version.
- try fixing the problem yourself. This becomes easier once you understand
Project.tomlfiles and how they declare their compatiblity requirements. We'll return to this example in Fixing conflicts.
As packages are updated and projects are deleted, installed package versions and artifacts that were once used will inevitably become old and not used from any existing project.
Pkg keeps a log of all projects used so it can go through the log and see exactly which projects still exist and what packages/artifacts those projects used. If a package or artifact is not marked as used by any project, it is added to a list of orphaned packages. Packages and artifacts that are in the orphan list for 30 days without being used again are deleted from the system on the next garbage collection. This timing is configurable via the
collect_delay keyword argument to
Pkg.gc(). A value of
0 will cause anything currently not in use immediately, skipping the orphans list entirely; If you are short on disk space and want to clean out as many unused packages and artifacts as possible, you may want to try this, but if you need these versions again, you will have to download them again. To run a typical garbage collection with default arguments, simply use the
gc command at the
(v1.0) pkg> gc Active manifests at: `~/BinaryProvider/Manifest.toml` ... `~/Compat.jl/Manifest.toml` Active artifacts: `~/src/MyProject/Artifacts.toml` Deleted ~/.julia/packages/BenchmarkTools/1cAj: 146.302 KiB Deleted ~/.julia/packages/Cassette/BXVB: 795.557 KiB ... Deleted `~/.julia/artifacts/e44cdf2579a92ad5cbacd1cddb7414c8b9d2e24e` (152.253 KiB) Deleted `~/.julia/artifacts/f2df5266567842bbb8a06acca56bcabf813cd73f` (21.536 MiB) Deleted 36 package installations (113.205 MiB) Deleted 15 artifact installations (20.759 GiB)
Note that only packages in
~/.julia/packages are deleted.